Craig and Ortlund Clash on the Eucharist (Respectful Dialogue)
https://youtu.be/imFpLS1I-Hk?si=Kww5RbfGGUvVv8ua
Craig and Ortlund Clash on the Eucharist (Respectful Dialogue)
https://youtu.be/imFpLS1I-Hk?si=Kww5RbfGGUvVv8ua
How Did Infant Baptism Begin: A Story of Five Centuries of Church History
[Gavin Ortlund]
https://youtu.be/3WE0Ea2ke_c?si=aYNPAT0NAxwC8NMv
The following link is to Curt Daniel's excellent and well informed lecture series on Calvinism's history ans theology.
The History and Theology of Calvinism by Curt Daniel
Many of my blogposts in this blog are to Gavin Ortlund's defense of Protestantism. Here are more videos by him all grouped together.
How Do We KNOW the New Testament Canon
https://youtu.be/06ItjoHCp28
How Protestants View the Papacy (Debate Reaction)
https://youtu.be/Lx6GzN_qgiM
The Immaculate Conception A Protestant Evaluation
https://youtu.be/PR9EbapyPcg
Augustine on the Rock of Matthew 16 (This Will Surprise You)
https://youtu.be/Mslw0lS1ZLQ
The Biggest Misunderstanding About Protestantism
https://youtu.be/Fsjd8xY9OSM
Answering Taylor Marshall on the Eucharist
https://youtu.be/t7xn5hyYiKk
A Protestant Take on Ignatius
https://youtu.be/z42SQYXuXok
A "Worship Problem" For Protestants?
https://youtu.be/lupFft2GqOc
Sola Scriptura is Totally Medieval!
https://youtu.be/3NuskiZmfb0
Did Protestants Remove Books From the Bible !
https://youtu.be/WnzbNkIKwUQ
No, Jerome Didn't Accept a Larger Canon
https://youtu.be/rpHUeTZjeuQ
Origen on Praying to Saints: FINAL Response to Joe Heschmeyer
https://youtu.be/fayEcMfouOc
We all know that Wikipedia isn't infallible and in fact makes mistakes. Nevertheless, here's an interesting Wiki article on Proto-Protestants. Meaning, people prior to the Protestant Reformation who taught (often in bits and pieces) similar things that the Protestant Reformers taught.
Before You Become Eastern Orthodox...
by Gavin Ortlund
https://youtu.be/q7eih3Bqgv0
Eastern Orthodox Critics: My Question For You
by Gavin Ortlund
https://youtu.be/0J7HQCvFfTY
I don't take a stand on this issue. But here are some videos on the topic from Protestant points of view.
Cyril Lucaris Calvinist Patriarch Orthodox Saint
https://youtu.be/_yQBY2lPWUc?si=Ix9ueolwGMXLyIik
Let's Make Cyril Lucaris Great Again!
https://youtu.be/vM4tcSQz16A?si=ShSKmvT4bMRiHZnD
The Two Faces of Cyril Lucaris. Was He An Evil Calvinist Patriarch Or A Good Eastern Orthodox Saint?
https://youtu.be/r4Dhtkwpqw4?si=Mp92vovJl9sXrGfX
Ah Yes, That Calvinist Orthodox Patriarch (Cyril Lucaris) [by Gavin Ortlund]
https://youtu.be/A7cE1IfHC2w?si=7fps55KQWe_poRhH
As I often point out I'm theologically Baptist, Calvinist and Continuationist. But I appreciate my fellow conservative Protestants who aren't Baptist. Here's Lutheran pastor William Weedon's testimony IN TWO PARTS. Plus another video. See also YouTube videos of Joshua Schooping who did convert to
Orthodoxy, became an Orthodox priest, but later reverted back to Evangelical Protestantism and is
now a Lutheran Pastor as well. One of my other blogs has a link to Schooping's testimony.
The following videos are on YouTube.
Why you should stay Lutheran: It's all about conscience Rev. William Weedon pt 1 REMASTERED
https://youtu.be/MSArM0xxtxQ
Why you should stay Lutheran: It's all about conscience Rev. William Weedon pt 2 REMASTERED
https://youtu.be/usvyxJL4SGQ
Why you should be Lutheran INSTEAD of Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox (w/ Pr. Will Weedon)
https://youtu.be/FtJodGxj-Js
Baptist scholar Gavin Ortlund's introduction to his new book explaining Protestantism.
I Wrote A Book About Protestantism
[by Gavin Ortlund]
https://youtu.be/CpbNxrZlXfo?si=rNFX9aERDIDs7_-9
A Protestant apologist and Anglican I appreciate, Sean Luke, wrote an aticle/blog disagreeing with an article by fellow Anglican Gillis J. Harp posted at TGC on Anglicanism. I'm not an Anglican, but I'm appreciative of conservative Anglicanism. Some of my favorite theological writers and heroes of the faith were Anglicans. I side more with TGC's views than Luke's. Though, there are areas where I think Luke has a good points.
Gillis J. Harp's article: Anglicans, Let’s Stay True to Our Confessional Heritage
Sean Luke's response article Anglicans: Let's Stay True to Our Reformational Catholic Heritage (A Response to The Gospel Coalition)
The following responses to Catholicism are older and therefore less relevant and less sophisticated than modern Protestant responses. Nevertheless, they are interesting as historical glimpses as to what Protestants and Catholics believed about each other back then and the polemics used back then. I recently read them and found them profitable and encouraging. They help confirm my Protestant convictions that Catholicism is false and an incoherent ahistorical system.
They are all freely available online:
Joseph Hall's No Peace with Rome: Wherein Is Proved, That, As Terms Now Stand, There Can Be No Reconcilation of the Reformed Religion with the Romish : And That the Romanists Are in All the Fault
George Bull's A Vindication of the Church of England, From the Errors and Corruptions of the Church of Rome [starting at page 137]
George Bull's The Corruptions of the Church of Rome, in Relation to Ecclesiastical
Government, the Rule of Faith, and Form of Divine Worship; in Answer to
the Bishop of Meaux's Queries [starting at page 235]
John Jewel's An Apology of the Church of England by John Jewel
translated by Anne Lady Bacon
https://archive.org/details/a588502700jeweuoft
translated by William Withers Ewbank
https://www.google.com/books/edition/An_apology_of_the_Church_of_England_tr_b/onQEAAAAQAAJ?hl
translated by William Withers Ewbank
https://archive.org/details/anapologyofchurc00jeweuoft/mode/2up
In light of the alleged "Asbury Revival" (which I'm not necessarily endorsing OR denouncing), here's Gavin Ortlund's video on revivals in general in light of the recent Asbury Revival.
Revival at Asbury? A Theological Reflection
https://youtu.be/MwF-d4ghKVA
(posted 1/5/2023)
I'm not yet convinced that the Pope is the Anti-Christ. That's the historic Protestant position going back to the days of the Protestant Reformation. Usually with the eschatological assumption of Historicism whereby the book of Revelation has been being fulfilled slowly down through history. I myself tend to interpret the book of Revelation in a Partial Preterist and Idealist way. Though, I'm slowly looking into the case for Historicism.
I think the pope is *an* anti-Christ even if I'm not yet convinced he's *the* anti-Christ. I say that even though there probably are some genuinely saved people in the Catholic Church. I believe there's enough truth in Catholicism for some to possibly be saved despite all the "traditions of men" that water down the truth and despite the official Catholic gospel not technically being a saving gospel. This is because perfect doctrine doesn't save. Rather it is Christ who saves, normatively through the very basics of the Gospel which include things like the doctrine of the Trinity and salvation by grace. Catholicism technically teaches both. Though, Catholicism's complex Gospel with all the accretions of the traditions of men technically denies (either outright, or at the very least implicitly) the sufficiency of the redemption Christ purchased at the cross in many ways.
The following is a link to some message that argue for the historic Protestant position that the Pope is the Anti-Christ.