"But solid food is for the mature, who because of practice have their senses trained to discern good and evil."- Hebrews 5:14

Monday, June 2, 2025

Non-Christians CAN Do Things to "Prepare" Themselves For Salvation Even On Calvinism

 

Notice I wrote the word "Prepare" in quotation marks. That's because these preparations are not in the Roman Catholic sense of congruous merit, whereby an unregenerate person can do good works which make it proper for God to graciously reward it with regeneration. It is the reward or grace given by God not because it is strictly owed, but because it is fitting for God to give it — due to His love, generosity, and promises even prior to regeneration. Calvinism denies THAT. These "preparations," from a Calvinist point of view, are NOT absolutely necessary before regeneration happens, but are nevertheless commanded by God to be performed by us, and are often the means by which God grants regeneration. Some, like Edwards below, say it is the usual way. I don't know if it is the usual way, but it is the prescribed way by God. The following long excerpt is from the excellent defense of Calvinism titled Veritas Redux by Calvinist John Edwards (1637-1716) [not to be confused with Calvinist Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758)]. I've omitted the footnotes. I've also linked to Veritas Redux in my blogpost HERE.

To sum up in a sentence what this blogpost is about, I quote Edwards [taken from below]: "But as the Mariner cannot command the Wind, yet he can hoist up his Sails to receive it. So the Holy Spirit (who is compared to the Wind) is not at our beck; but we can do that, in the use of which the Spirit is usually convey'd to Men."

See also my blogpost: Counsel For Those Doubting or Doubtful of Their Election


I wrote in another blogpost the following which is very similar to the advice that John Edwards gives in the long excerpt below:

As one notable Calvinist put it, "I believe in this infallible book, in the last analysis, because 'of the inward work of the Holy Spirit, bearing witness by and with the word in my heart.' " [Cornelius Van Til here is alluding to the WCF]

Does that mean that humans can't affect their eternal destinies by looking for God and examining the various evidences for God? No, it doesn't. One cannot change their pre-ordained destiny, but one can affect it because God ordains both the ends as well as the means; all the while upholding causal relations. In other words, God providentially predestines not only what will happen, but how they will happen.

So, if God ordained that a person will be saved, then God also ordained the means to their salvation. That can include things like their 1. seeking for God, 2. examining the evidences, 3. praying, 4. reading the Bible, 5. studying apologetics et cetera.

It will be argued, "Sure, God may also ordain the means, but people will not actually seek God unless and until God first regenerates them so that they can genuinely and sincerely seek after God." The charges and assumptions being, that it's not possible for people to initiate a search for God. And that therefore there's no point in admonishing people to search for God. Also, unless they first have reason to believe they are regenerated (and/or numbered among the elect), they have no reason to have confidence or expectation that their search will be fruitful and that they will, in the end, actually find God. But those are false inferences. God's promise that those who sincerely seek Him will find Him stand (e.g. James 4:8; John 6:37b; Matt. 11:28-30; Isa. 55:6-7; Jer. 29:13; Ps. 145:18; cf. James 1:8.; Luke 11:9-10; Heb. 11:6). That's true whether one is regenerated or not. Moreover, God doesn't require either the elect or non-elect to know they are regenerated or elect before they can seek after Him. Humans are free moral agents (even if they don't have libertarian free wills as Calvinism implies). Being free moral agents created by God, all humans have the duty to seek after God and believe in Him regardless of the possibility of their success in that search.

Given Calvinism, both the elect and non-elect can "search" for God, but only the elect will sincerely, honestly and persistently search for Him because of regeneration. Since a knowledge of one's regeneration isn't essential to saving faith, everyone can have personal psychological hope that they might find God by searching for Him.

Therefore, regarding those who are currently non-Christians, for all they know, God will use their search for Him (whether it's currently sincere or insincere) to eventually lead to their finding Him. Their search which may have begun insincerely may end up being sincere by the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit. So, we are all without excuse if we fail to search for God.



Below is the long excerpt taken from Veritas Redux (Book II, chapter 3, page 365 and following pages).


The Fifth and Last Proposition is yet behind, which is this, That tho' God be the sole Author of Man's Conversion, and of all Holiness that accompanies it and follows it, yet this Conversion and Holiness are to be promoted in us by the use of proper Means and Endeavours. Tho' Conversion be from God alone, yet there are some certain Acts which are in our Power, and there are ordinarily required before the State of Regeneration and Conversion. Tho' Grace be Free, yet it is usually conferr'd in a way of previous Dispositions, antecedent Qualifications, and fitting Preparatives. God enables Men to will and to do, but by certain Means which they are to be concern'd in. It is not enough, saith the great Master Medics, for the Physitian to do his Duty, unless the Patient also doth his. Which is very applicable to the spiritual State of Men: God our great Physician requires that we do something towards the Health and Happiness of our Souls. He takes great care of us that we should be saved, but Men ought to have care of themselves. For tho' it is he only that gives Grace, yet he gives it in the use of Means and our proper Endeavours. Some, I know, are unwilling that these should be call'd Dispositions, or Qualifications, or even Preparatives to Grace and Conversion, but I will not quarrel about Words, I will not stand with any one for an Expression; but this is the Thing I contend for, that generally and usually there are certain external and internal Acts which are the Forerunners of Conversion, and we are bound to exert these Acts. We do not admit of, yea we reject Preparatory Works in the Sense of the Romanist [[[by which I suspect Edwards is referring to Congruous Merit as opposed to Condign Merit which are both taught in Catholicism–me AnnoyedPinoy]]; but so far as they signify Means and Ways that God hath appointed to be used to bring us to Salvation, we have reason to allow of them. For God ordinarily saves Men in the use of these, and therefore we are oblig'd to use them.

The Scripture often makes mention of these, and that invites me in the next Place to set down particularly what those Means, what those Acts and Endeavours are which are requir'd on our part towards the obtaining Grace and Conversion, and everlasting Life and Happiness. For tho' Conversion and Salvation be the work of God, yet he hath directed us to Ways which are conduing [[["conducing"?–AP]] to it, and tending towards it. First, We must inform ourselves aright, we must learn what our State and Condition is, and we must labour to understand what is God's Will concerning us, and what it is that he requires of us. We must consult our selves, and look into our own Breasts, and make use of our Reason and natural Light, and exert our Understandings and Judgments. God hath not made us Brutes or Stock, but rational Creatures; wherefore let us act as such, as knowing that God is pleas'd to enlighten and convert Men in the exercise of their natural Faculties, and in the use of those Powers and Abilities which he hath given them, and thereby distinguish'd them from other Creatures.

We must Pray with the greatest Importunity, and earnestly beg the Divine Assistance for the atchieving [[ probably a typo for "achieving"–AP]] so great and weighty an Enterprise. God having promised to give the Holy Spirit to them that ask it, Luke xi. 15. we are to sollicite Heaven for it. Seeing the Way of Man is not in himself, and it is not in Man that walketh to direct his Steps [[Jer. 10:23]]; we ought with the greatest Ardency to beseech Almighty God to help and direct us into the Way of Life and Salvation. He hath abundantly declared in his Word, that this one Way which we are to make use of, and that is generally necessary to the obtaining of Happiness.

We are to apply our selves not only to Prayer, but to Reading and Hearing God's Word. We must often converse with the Scriptures, they being a Lamp unto our Feet, and a Light unto our Path [[Ps. 119:105]]; and hereby we may expect to be directed into the Way of Salvation. These Holy Oracles, if we frequently consult them, will rectify our Apprehensions and Judgments concerning the Things of God. Here we are sure to come to a sight of our Sins, to discern Gods [[sic]] Curse and Judgments against Sinners, and to know how to avoid them. And here are Promises as well as Threatnings; so that we may be wrought upon not only thro' Fear of Punishment, but thro' Hope of Pardon and Mercy. More especially it is God's Will that the Preaching of the Word should be serviceable to this purpose, and that it should be the great Instrument of Conversion and Regeneration. Being assured that Faith comes by hearing [[Rom. 10:17]], we ought to make use of this sacred Institution, and to receive with meekness the ingrafted Word, which is able to save our Souls [[Jam. 1:21]].

Consideration is another previous Act in order to our turning to God. A Man must sit down and consider, and seriously reflect on his Ways, and search and enquire into his past Life, and then his Conscience will represent unto him the danger and misery of his Condition, and shew him the necessity of a speedy deliverance out of it. From the Psalmist's Example and Experience we learn how necessary Thinking is. I thought on my Ways, saith he, and turned my Feet unto thy Testimonies, Psal. cxix. 59. And this Thoughtfulness is accompanied with searching and trying our Way, which prepares us for turning unto the Lord, as we find in Lam. iii. 40. And the constant Attendant of Thinking and Consideration is Resolution, and making solemn Promises and Vows of Repentance and Obedience.

We can in a great measure divert our Thoughts, and not suffer them to fasten on vain and sinful Objects, which are the great Corrupters of our Minds. We can check our Imagination, which s the Ground-work of many Vices. We can also lay a Restraint, on our Outward Senses, which are the common In-lets of Sin. We can turn away our Eyes, and stop our Ears, that they may not take in Impressions of Lust and Vanity. In these things it is certain we have some command over our selves.

We are also to betake our selves to Acts of Mortification, and Self-denial, for some of these are in our power. We are carefully to avoid the Temptations to Sin, to block up all the Avenues to it, and to shun all the Occasions of it. We must, and we can, refrain from converse with the prophane [[sic]]. We must turn from it, and pass away, Prov. iv. 14, 15. And we must not only keep out of evil Company, or abandon it, but we have Legs to carry us into better Society, where we may hold conversation with those that are good.

Again, We can, and ought, to make use of our natural Temper, Ingeny and Instinct, our Frame and Constitution of Body, and the inbred Tendency of our Minds, together with our Education, the Examples that are set before us, the Occurrences and Events which happen by Divine Providence, we are, I say, to make use of all these, and of every Thing in our Life, to the bringing us to a Sense of our State and of our Duty, and to the producing of Religion and Holiness in us.

Lastly, We are to avoid Idleness, which is the great Nourisher of vitious Thoughts and Actions, and we must fill up our Time with lawful Business, and religious Employment. If we be diligent, industrious and active, we shall find a wonderful Success accompanying it. They tell us, that those Two Famous Grecian Orators, Isocrates [[Socrates?]] and Demosthenes, arrived to that perfection, which they were Masters of by exquisite Study and Application. They would sit up late, and rise early; they would keep at home two or three Months together, and shave part of their Heads, that they might not be prevailed with to go abroad. The vast Pains which the latter of them took in forming his Voice is related by several good Authors; they tell strange Things to this purpose, but the Sum of all is, That what was denied him by Nature, he got by Art and Study, by Exercise and Industry. The same may be done with respect to the external Part of Religion, and to the Means that we are to make use of, for of these I'm now speaking. God hath placed these outward and common Things very much in our own Power; wherefore let us be careful that we be not wanting to our selves, but let us do what we can, and what is required to be done on our part; and let us do it strenuously, and to our utmost.

It is in our power to pray, to read the Word, to hear it, to think and meditate on it, to consider our Ways and to call our Sins to remembrance, to abandon some of them, as to the outward Act, to deny our selves, in some measure to improve what happens to us in the World, to our good. Our own Abilities reach thus far; we have Strength to perform these Things: Wherefore it is said, Awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, Eph. v. 14. that is, use the Means to awaken and rouze [[sic]], and to enliven thy self, and then it follows, Christ shall give thee Life [[sic]], namely, in the conscientious use of those Means. Sinners are are not so fast asleep, nor so dead in their Sins, as to be bereav'd of all Apprehension: They are Men still, their Faculties are not lost and destroy'd, they are capable of some Impressions, they can do something in order to Wakening and Rising, tho' these themselves be from a Divine and Supernatural Power, and are proper to the Almighty alone. Conversion and Repentance are the sole Gifts of God, but they are ordinarily acquir'd in the use of humane [[sic]] Helps and Endeavours. And we must make use of these, as far as in us lies; we must do all that on our part we are able to do, remembring [[sic]] this, that tho' the Change of our Hearts be the Effect of Divine Grace only, yet a neglect and contempt of the Means is unjustifiable.

Wherefore these Two Cautions we must take along with us, or otherwise we shall not understand this matter aright, yea we shall egregiously err, and abuse our selves. First, We must be careful to remember that nothing of all this that we do, or can do, is the work of Conversion. No, that is another Thing; it is no less than an effectual Renewing, and saving Change of the Heart and Life. Now, this is God's sole Work; this is effected by the special Operation of the Spirit. As to the Things before-mention'd, they may be done by those that are not elected, those that were never design'd for Happiness; yea, the worst of Men, and Reprobates may do most of them, or any other external Acts of Religion. But no Man can be Converted, no Man can be effectually Enlightened and Renew'd by any thing that is in his own power, by any Talents of Nature, or by any Humane Efforts whatsoever. It is necessary that the Holy Ghost by a peculiar Operation and Influence upon the Sinner's Eyes, turn his Heart, incline his Will, and sanctifie [[i.e. sanctify]] his whole Man. So that Conversion and Sanctification are to be attributed wholly to God's Spirit, and the Supernatural Assistance of it. This we ought to fix on our Minds, that we may have a right Apprehension concerning those Endeavours which I have before particularly enumerated.

Before we are renew'd by the Holy Spirit, we must not look upon them as any part of Conversion and real Sanctification, but only as Helps to these, tho' afterwards they become Parts and Ingredients of true Holiness. I consider them at present as Helps and Means, which God is wont to make successful to the Elect by a particular Blessing upon them. In the use of these he is pleas'd to give power to believe and repent, and to turn unto him. His Spirit accompanies them, and works Grace in us by them. Of the Lepers it is said, As they were going to the Priests they were cleans'd. They did what Christ enjoin'd them, and we see the Success of it. Their going to the Priests was not the Cause of their being cleans'd, but it was our Saviour's Pleasure that they should be cleans'd as they went, that the one should accompany the other. So it is here, we are bid to pray, to hear and read God's Word, &c. and as we are doing these Things we shall be cleansed, we shall be renewed, we shall be sanctified. Tho' we are by Nature dead in Sin, yet this doth not denote that we are not able to do some Actions, which God makes use of as Means towards the changing of Mens [[sic]] Hearts, and whereby the Spirit doth work Conversion. Wherefore we are to apply our selves to these Means, tho' the efficacious and saving Work is God's only, by his powerful enlightning our Minds, and changing our Hearts. 

Again, we must remember this, that Grace is not due to those who improve their natural Strength, and use the means of Conversion and Sanctification; nothing can be done by us to merit Grace or Salvation; it is for the merit of Christ that any saving Grace is imparted to us. But tho' no performances are acceptable to God for their worth, yet he himself commands us to do them, and will not accept of us without them. We are bid to read, pray, hear, shun the occasions of Sin, avoid evil Company, and use all other means and endeavours; not that there is any value in them, in respect of God, but because he hath ordained that they shall be forerunners of Grace and Mercy, and that in the use o them, Grace shall be given to us. God doth not confer Grace upon us for these Endeavours, but he gives it us by them. We can challenge no such thing, nor is it in consideration of what we do, that God is thus favourable to us; but God is pleased to make this the Order and Constitution of the Gospel, and therefore we are obligated to comply with it. And so as to subsequent Grace, whatever some say, the good use of the former Grace, is no cause of the bestowing more Grace afterwards: It is not for the sake of our Improvements that farther Grace is given; for we are to know, that the After-grace is as freely conferr'd, as the preceding one.

But that which I'm now urging is this; that we must by no means imaging, that the Endeavours before spoken of, are the cause of Conversion, and the procurers of the Efficacious Grace of the Holy Spirit. But as the Mariner cannot command the Wind, yet he can hoist up his Sails to receive it. So the Holy Spirit (who is compared to the Wind) is not at our beck; but we can do that, in the use of which the Spirit is usually convey'd to Men. Those previous Acts are in our power, and they are ordinarily requisite to Conversion and Regeneration: And we have no reason to expect, that we can be regenerated and converted without these. Hence it is, that Men are said in Scripture to convert themselves, and to turn themselves; that is, they use the proper means in order to it: They do their part toward Conversion, tho' the work it self of Conversion be not in their power in the least. This is the true account of the matter.

And hereby these Questions are resolv'd, Whether we may be said to do any thing in the Work of Conversion; and whether there are any Dispositions, Qualifications, or Preparations to Conversion? As to the former, the answer is easie [[easy]]: God himself will have the sole Honor and Prerogative of changing Mens Hearts, of begetting in them true Grace, and the Principle of sincere Holiness; bu the employs us in those things which are in order to it, and which he hath constituted as Means. All that we can do, will not arrive to Regeneration; but we must not be defective in what we are able to do; tho' we can do nothing of the very work it self of Conversion, that requiring an Almighty Power, yet we may do something toward it, and I have shewed what that is: Tho' we can't convert our selves, yet we can do that which God requires us to do. As to the latter Question, it is plain, that there are usually certain Dispositions and Preparations to Conversion; and yet our Church [[i.e. the Church of England]] is in the right when she saith, A Man cannot prepare himself by his own natural Strength and good Works, to faith and calling on God; for an unregenerate Man can do nothing that is acceptable in it self to God. The praying, hearing, reading, &c. which I mentioned before, being performed before Conversion and the infusion of Divine Grace, are not in their own nature valuable; but thus far they are acceptable, that they are in order to that great Change; and likewise we are commanded by God to use them: But the success of them is from him, and it is he that works these Dispositions in us, so far as they are acceptable. Let us then understand our selves aright, and apply our selves seriously to what is our own peculiar part. We are to know, that our personal and proper Action is not inconsistent with God's Grace and Divine Assistance. God effects that which we are not able to do, and yet we have ability to do something, and we must in good earnest set our selves about that. It is not in our power to convert our selves, but our endeavours are, that is, by God's ordinary assistance, and therefore God requires these, and hath no where promis'd to save us, without the concurrence of these.

I am speaking now of what is the usual method of Heaven; but I cannot say that it is thus always, for, as I have observed more than once, God ties not himself up to one certain way; he is pleased to act in a different manner, and to vary from himself. Those Preparations before spoken of, are not absolutely necessary, tho' they are usually required. Sometimes there is no concurrence of Man, God himself doth all: He gives his Grace and holy [[sic]] Spirit, without our asking and seeking, or any other previous dispositions. Of such Conversion we read sometimes in Scripture, and when the Apostle speaks of God's Sovereign Power, in the 9th to the Romans, he is partly to be understood thus. The first Motions and Influences of the holy Spirit, are sometimes precedaneous to all Means and Endeavours in Man: He infuses Grace into some Mens Souls, tho' they are wholly unprepared, as to any of these things that I have mentioned; he immediately acts on their Minds, and in a violent and forcible way breaks in upon them.

But generally it is otherwise; he acts according to the rational Nature of Men, and for the most part in a moral way. They are wrought upon by Persuasion, and in the use of proper Means. He disposes Men for his special Grace, by ordinary and common Grace; he prepares them for one by the other. Yea, it is not improbable that St. Paul himself had been prepared himself in some measure, by the Convictions of his own Conscience, and by his knowledge of the Law of God; but especially he was startled and rouz'd, by those remarkable Thing which hapned [[sic]] to him when he was on his Journey to Damascus, namely, the amazing Light which struck him blind, the wonderful and surprizing [sic] Voice which he heard from Heaven, and his violent and unexpected Fall to the ground. It seem'd good to the Divine Wisdom, that these extraordinary Occurrences should be instrumental toward his Conversion, by awakening his Mind, and fitting him to receive the Divine Impressions.

However, in the ordinary way of God's Dispensations, it is not to be denied, that Means and Preparatives are made use of in order to Conversion. God hath so appointed it, that generally these shall accompany the Divine Power. Yea, tho' Grace be by immediate Infusion, yet it is reasonable to assert, that this is in the use of such means as are of God's appointment; such are our natural Powers and Faculties, our Understanding and Will, and such are our Endeavours, and all those Means before discoursed of. Wherefore a very judicious Writer of our Church, pronounces it very peremptorily [[sic]], that tho' Faith be immediately infused, yet it excludes not, but rather more necessarily requires precedent human Endeavours for the attaining it. For this and other Graces are imparted and conveyed in the use of these Endeavours; and tho' they be infused Habits, yet they are wrought in us by degrees, and not without industry and diligence.

Wherefore here is an Extreme to be avoided, which too many are apt to run into, namely, that because Conversion and continuance in Holiness are from God, and are the work of his holy Spirit, therefore they think they may be idle and careless, and that they are excused from using any means and endeavours; and that they need not strive against their Lusts and vitious Propensions, or take any pains to curb and suppress them: They expect to be wholly assisted from above, therefore they sit still and do nothing. It is God's Work to save them, to sanctifie them, to give them strength against their Sins, to enable them to subdue their Lusts; therefore they neglect the use o those Means that are in their own power, and those Christian Endeavours which are prescribed us by God himself. But let mistaken People say what they will, we must be diligent and laborious in the use of those Means, which are in order to eternal Life and Happiness. This is according to the express Command of our Saviour, Labour for that meat which endureth unto everlasting Life, John vi. 27. Yea, tho' tis added, The Son of Man shall give it unto you, yet we must labour and work for it. And the same infallible Instructer acquaints us, that the kingdom of Heaven suffereth violence, and the violent (not the idle and lazy) take it by force, Matt. xi. 12. I have thus largely insisted upon this Head, because I would beat down that fond mistake which hath possessed the minds of some well-meaning Persons, that we are to do nothing in order to our Regeneration and Conversion, and the change of our Hearts and Lives.

That Text is misunderstood by some, Come, buy wine and milk without money, and without price, Isai. lv. 1. as if it excluded our labour and Endeavours: But this cannot be the meaning of the words, because God in many other places (which I have above recited) calls us to do our part, to make use of our Faculties and Powers, and not to neglect the helps to Conversion and Salvation. To understand this Text aright, we must know, that this part of the Chapter speaks of the Undertakings of Christ, and of the Grace and Mercy which are contain'd in the Gospel thro' him. These can't be bought by any thing that we can do; we have nothing to give or offer in order to purchasing them: All that is required of us, is to hold but our hands, to take what is offered to us, to accept of what Christ hath done for us, to lay hold on him, and firmly embrace the tender [[i.e. offer]] of Life and Salvation. But then we must remember, that every one that thirsteth is invited to come; and those that are to have a share in this Evangelical Grace, are bid by God to hearken diligently unto him, v. 2. and to encline their ears, and hear, v. 3. and to seek the Lord, and to call upon him, v. 6. All which expresses to us the use of Means. So then, tho' we are to buy wine and milk (which express to us the Grace of God, and the Benefits of the Gospel) without money and without price; that is, without any thing that can be look'd upon as a valuable Consideration for them; yet we cannot (in the ordinary way) attain to these without some pains and industry: For these are the ways in which, and by which, those that God designs to make happy, shall attain to Grace and Holiness. God's working doth not take away ours; that is, our applying our selves to the means, and being diligent in doing all that we can; yea, the former is an encouragement to the latter: For, if we be industrious and sincere, and look up to the Almighty for strength and ability, we shall undoubtedly prosper in our undertaking. We ought then to reckon it our Duty and Concern, to be diligent in the ways of Godliness: We must not, like the idle and slothful Servant [[cf. Luke 19:12ff.]], wrap up our Talent in a Napkin, but conscientiously improve it: For this is certain, that God (in the usual method of his dealings with Mankind) will have our own endeavours concur to our Salvation. For this was my last Proposition, and I hope I have sufficiently proved it, That tho' Conversion be by Divine Grace, yet we are capable of promoting it, by the use of proper Means and Endeavours. 

 Again I've linked to Veritas Redux in my blogpost HERE

 

 

 

 

Sunday, June 1, 2025

William Cooper's sermons on Predestination Recommended by George Whitefield

 

Famous Calvinist preacher George Whitefield wrote in a letter to his famous Arminian friend the preacher John Wesley the following:

But I referred you at the beginning of this letter, to Dr. Edwards' Veritas Redux which I recommended to you in a late letter, with Elisha Coles on God's Sovereignty. Be pleased to read those; and also the excellent sermons of Mr. Cooper, of Boston, in New England which I also sent you, and I doubt not but you will see all your objections answered.- from Whitefield's letter to Wesley HERE or in The Memoirs of Rev. George Whitefield, page 640
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Memoirs_of_Rev_George_Whitefield/3-mHU6GQqvwC?hl=en&gbpv=0


I'm not certain that the "Cooper" and the sermons of that "Cooper" that George Whitefield was referring to is the same person as the William Cooper of the following sermons. I asked Artificial Intelligence twice and one time AI said it was likely a "Thomas Cooper" and another time AI said it was a "William Cooper." But since I could only find the sermons of the William Cooper linked below, I therefore post them here on this blogpost. It's likely the correct Cooper, because it's in the right Era and right Location. Whitefield said it was  Mr. Cooper from Boston, and these sermons were preached from William Cooper from Boston to his church in Boston [according to the sermon collections themselves] .


The Doctrine of Predestination Unto Life, Explained and Vindicated: In Four Sermons by William Cooper


An 80 MB scanned file
https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_the-doctrine-of-predesti_cooper-william_1765/mode/2up

or
What appears to be an OCR (optical character recognition) scan to html text version 
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=evans;idno=N03677.0001.001

or
A large 93 MB scanned file
https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_the-doctrine-of-predesti_cooper-william_1740/page/n6/mode/1up

or
A smaller 4.5 MB scanned file, but lower quality
https://archive.org/details/doctrinepredest00coopgoog/page/n8/mode/2up


 

 

 

Veritas Redux: Evangelical Truths Restored by John Edwards

 

In this blogpost I'm featuring Volume One of John Edwards' planned body of divinity. This volume was dedicated to the doctrine of predestination as understood in Calvinism. The second volume was on the doctrine of justification. I'm not sure what volume 3 was focused on or whether he lived long enough to finish a volume 4. This John Edwards [1637-1716] is not to be confused with the more famous Jonathan Edwards [1703-1758]. Both famous preachers Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield recommended John Edwards' works. It's unfortunate that John Edwards is mostly forgotten in the theological community. Surprisingly his books are not hosted at www.Monergism.com. I recently finished reading this first volume and I was thoroughly impressed, informed and edified. He presented a good case for infralapsarianism against supralapsarianism. I myself lean slightly toward supra, but because of reading this book, I'm now much more open to supralapsarianism. I only came across this book because it was recommended in the well known popular introduction to Calvinism, The Five Points of Calvinism by David N. Steele. I also read one of [a number of] John Edwards' books in defense of the Trinity.

Below is the the link to the scanned book. Unfortunately, some pages and sentences were hard to read or illegible. But I was able to read about 99% of the book. It's well worth the effort and frustration. His other book "The Arminian Doctrines Condemn'd" is even more illegible. But I nevertheless include the link to it.

In his book, Steele wrote:

This volume is a study of the five points of Calvinism by one of the great Puritan Calvinists of England. John Edwards (1637-1716) was thought to be one of the foremost Calvinists of his time, and this work represents the very nature presentation of his position both positively, by direct reference to Scriptural foundations, and negatively, by contrast with the Arminian point of view. The work is unfortunately out of print and very rare, but it is one of the plainest and most mature presentations of the Calvinistic point of view ever produced. Some publisher would do a great service to the cause of truth by reprinting this work.


Famous Calvinist preacher George Whitefield wrote in a letter to his famous Arminian friend the preacher John Wesley the following:

"But I referred you, at the beginning of this letter, to Dr. Edwards's Veritas Redux, which I recommended to you also in a late letter, with Elisha Coles on God's Sovereignty. Be pleased to read these, and also the excellent sermons of Mr. Cooper of Boston in New England (which I also sent you) and I doubt not but you will see all your objections answered." -from Whitefield's letter to Wesley which can be read HERE or in The Memoirs of Rev. George Whitefield, page 640 here.

Daniel C. Norman in his (2022?) book Saving the Church of England: John Edwards (1637-1716) as Dissenting Conformer wrote:
Works of John Edwards also found a prominent place in the library of Jonathan Edwards. Six of them are listed in Jonathan Edwards’s “Catalogue.” Upon discovering these six to be of value, Jonathan Edwards expressed a desire to acquire Edwards’s other works.125 Jonathan’s father Timothy, pastor of the Congregational Church in East Windsor for nearly sixty-four years also profited from reading John Edwards, seen in citations from Veritas Redux and Theologia Reformata in his manuscript notebooks.126 With the interest of such high-profile ministers in New England, it is not surprising that some of Edwards’s works were printed in Boston.127 Some of his works were taken to Europe as evidenced by translations into German and French.128

Back in England, Edwards continued to be widely read. In the introduction to his A Compleat Body of Speculative and Practical Divinity, Thomas Stackhouse (1677–1752) wrote that of the “almost innumerable” works published as “Bodies of Divinity,” two are “the best known, and most in use,” those written by Edwards and Richard Fiddes (1671–1725). He called Edwards “very Learned” and his frequently footnoted works, “purely Calvinistical.”




Veritas Redux: Evangelical Truths Restored by John Edwards [VOLUME ONE]
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Veritas_Redux_Evangelical_truths_restore/WYuZmGF4oZMC?hl=en&gbpv=0 [SMALLER FILE]
OR
https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_veritas-redux-evangelic_edwards-john_1707_1 [LARGER FILE]


Veritas Redux Volume 2
[ on the subject of justification by faith, titled, The Doctrin of Faith and Justification Set in a True Light ]
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Veritas_Redux_Evangelical_truths_restore/437s_w0gk4wC?hl=en&gbpv=0

 
Veritas Redux Volume 3
[ on the subject of sanctification, titled, Theologia Reformata ]
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Veritas_Redux_Evangelical_truths_restore/cvYw8cux4dUC?hl=en&gbpv=0


The Arminian Doctrines Condemn'd by John Edwards
https://books.google.com/books?id=XaOgMhzoudUC&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false 

 



 

 

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Rebutting Bertuzzi's Top 3 Arguments Against Sola Scriptura

 

Another great refutation of Cameron Bertuzzi's arguments against Sola Scriptura. 

 

Rebutting Bertuzzi's Top 3 Arguments Against Sola Scriptura
https://youtu.be/VGQRMq6M4A4
Dr. Christopher Cloos (Philosophy, PhD)

 

Sola Scriptura DEFENDED Playlist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6ZAa0gNMvE&list=PLshImU6jwhvyFYwH_KCsnU_XVdLAbvSF5 

 

Tuesday, May 20, 2025

Is Sola Scriptura True? Refuting ‪@CapturingChristianity‬

 

Here' an excellent video by James Agnew refuting many objections to Sola Scriptura. Especially those of Cameron Bertuzzi. The vast majority of the Agnew's refutations are brilliant. Though, there are a few where his refutations are weak for various reasons. For example, when he occasionally didn't do an internal critique of Catholicism properly (etc.). Nevertheless, over all, this is one of the best take downs of objections to Sola Scriptura I've encountered. It's also a bit funny too. Unfortunately, Agnew admits his theology is not entirely orthodox in its Protestantism. For example, he holds to a Trinitarian model that incorporates partialism. Nevertheless, I post his video below because of how well he refutes Cameron Bertuzzi's arguments against Sola Scriptura.

 

 Is Sola Scriptura True? Refuting ‪@CapturingChristianity‬ 
https://youtu.be/MP7db7IZY2M


 Sola Scriptura DEFENDED Playlist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6ZAa0gNMvE&list=PLshImU6jwhvyFYwH_KCsnU_XVdLAbvSF5 

 

 

Sunday, April 6, 2025

Why Would the Devil Need to Steal the Word of God Sown in Unbelievers If Total Depravity Is True?

 

I asked Artificial Intelligence the following question:

On the hypothetical that Calvinism is true, why would the devil seek to blind the unregenate who were born blind so as not to see what they already cannot see? Why would the devil need to steal the word of God sown into unsaved people (through a preacher's preaching) if they can't naturally receive it anyway?


My answer has generally been that rhe devil can re-enforce and strengthen hardness of heart against the gospel.

Here's what Meta AI said:

You're raising a nuanced question about the relationship between spiritual blindness, the devil's actions, and the spread of the Gospel in the context of Calvinism. In Calvinist theology, the concept of total depravity suggests that all humans are born spiritually dead and unable to respond to God on their own. The devil's role in blinding the unregenerate is often seen as a reinforcement of this natural state, rather than a literal causing of blindness.

*Spiritual Blindness in Calvinism*

In this framework, spiritual blindness isn't just about physical sight but about the inability to understand or respond to spiritual truth. The devil's actions are often seen as a hindrance to the Gospel's spread, but this doesn't imply that he's causing a change in the unregenerate person's state. Instead, he's working to keep them in their natural condition of spiritual darkness.

*The Parable of the Sower*

Regarding the devil stealing the Word of God from unsaved people, this is often understood as a metaphor for the devil's attempts to prevent the Gospel from taking root in people's hearts. In Calvinist theology, the idea is that God sovereignly chooses to reveal Himself to some, and the devil tries to counter this work. The parable of the sower (Matthew 13:1–23, Mark 4:1–20, Luke 8:4–15) illustrates this concept, where the devil is seen as the one who snatches the seed (the Word of God) from people's hearts.

*Calvinist Perspectives*

Some Calvinist theologians, like John Calvin himself, interpret the devil's role in blinding the unregenerate as a means of preventing them from responding to the Gospel. Others, like Jonathan Edwards, emphasize the devil's efforts to keep people in a state of spiritual darkness, which is their natural condition apart from God's sovereign intervention.

These perspectives highlight the complex interplay between God's sovereignty, human responsibility, and the devil's actions in Calvinist theology.

Here's Grok's answer:

These are fascinating theological questions that hinge on the interplay between Calvinist doctrine and the role of the devil in human salvation—or lack thereof. Let’s unpack this step-by-step, assuming Calvinism’s framework of total depravity, unconditional election, and irresistible grace.
In Calvinism, the unregenerate—those not elected by God for salvation—are indeed spiritually blind from birth due to total depravity. This means they lack the natural ability to perceive or respond to spiritual truths, including the gospel. So, your first question is sharp: why would the devil bother blinding those who are already blind? If they can’t see the truth anyway, what’s the point of his interference?
One possible answer lies in the nature of the devil’s role and motives. Even if the unregenerate can’t naturally grasp the gospel, the act of preaching still scatters the "word of God" into the world, as in the parable of the sower (Matthew 13). The devil, as an adversary of God, might seek to ensure that this word doesn’t linger in their minds or stir any fleeting awareness that could indirectly serve God’s purposes—like prompting reflection or exposing their depravity more clearly. In Calvinism, while the unregenerate can’t savingly respond without God’s grace, they can still hear the word externally. The devil’s "blinding" (2 Corinthians 4:4) could be about reinforcing their natural state, keeping them comfortably numb in their blindness, and preventing any secondary effects of the gospel—like conviction of sin or a cultural shift toward godliness—that don’t require regeneration but still frustrate his aims.
Your second question—why the devil steals the word sown into unsaved people if they can’t receive it—ties into this. In the parable, the devil (the birds) snatches the seed that falls on the path before it takes root. In a Calvinist view, the unregenerate heart is like that hard path: incapable of receiving the word unto salvation without divine intervention. But the devil’s theft might not be about their potential to believe (which Calvinism denies they have naturally) but about his opposition to God’s glory. Every time the word is preached, it’s a declaration of God’s truth and power. By stealing it, the devil minimizes its presence in the world, thwarting even the external testimony to God’s character that the unregenerate might otherwise encounter and reject. It’s less about their salvation (already impossible without election) and more about his cosmic rebellion—ensuring God’s word doesn’t even get a hearing.
Another angle: the devil might not know who’s elect. Calvinism holds that election is God’s secret decree, not fully revealed in time. When a preacher sows the word, the devil could act preemptively, blinding and stealing indiscriminately, unaware of whether God might later regenerate someone. He’d rather overplay his hand than risk losing a soul God has chosen.
So, in short: the devil blinds the already blind and steals the word not because the unregenerate can naturally respond, but to maximize their alienation from God, disrupt the word’s broader impact, and oppose God’s glory at every turn—perhaps even hedging against the unknown of election. It’s a spiteful, tactical overkill consistent with his character as the ultimate enemy of God’s purposes. What do you think—does that resolve the tension, or does it raise more questions for you?

Saturday, March 29, 2025

Saturday, March 1, 2025

The Hyper-Calvinist Error of "Eternal Justification"

 

I just finished reading the excellent book "Eternal Justification: Gospel Preaching to Sinners Marred by Hyper-Calvinism" by David H. J. Gay. In the book Gay explains the Hyper-Calvinistic doctrine of "eternal justification" and why it's unbiblical and detrimental to the salvation of souls. Gay has a sermon series on the topic here:

Https://www.sermonaudio.com/series/8499

Presumably the series simplifies the issues and gives an introduction so that people will begin to understand the dangers of the doctrine. For more in-depth information, I recommend reading the book.


I'm now currently reading Gay's other book "Amyraut & Owen Tested: And Found Wanting." It's essentially the renamed and restructured 3rd edition of his book "Particular Redemption and the Free Offer." I'm reading it because I'm curious where he stands on the extent and intent of the atonement of Christ. By the title of the book it seems he likely holds some kind of mediating view that's in between Amyraldism and Owenian Limited Atonement. He has a sermon series on the topic here:

Https://www.sermonaudio.com/series/47209





Tuesday, February 4, 2025

Theological Frameworks and ChatGPT

 

I've switched theological frameworks a number of times in my Christian life. From what would have been considered Historic Premillennialism, to Revised Dispensationalism, to New Covenant Theology, back to Progressive Dispensationalism and then for a long time back to something like New Covenant Theology but with an affirmation of the imputation of Christ's active obedience and the law as a tutor pointing to Christ (two things which some NCT theologians sometimes rejected). Then in the 2010s I came across Progressive Covenantalism and found that it taught what I generally believed, and also taught additional things that made sense to me. So, from then on my tentative position has been Progressive Covenantalism.

For an introduction to the differences see this 4 lecture series by Stephen Wellum:

https://www.sermonaudio.com/series/155636


 DIRECT LINKS BELOW:

Differences Between Covenant, New Covenant, and Dispensational Theology: Session 1

Differences Between Covenant, New Covenant, and Dispensational Theology: Session 2

Differences Between Covenant, New Covenant, and Dispensational Theology: Session 3

Renewing our Confidence in our God who Makes and Keeps His Promises (Isaiah 40)


I decided to ask the following question of ChatGPT. While, I don't think its answers were always accurate, it was a pleasant surprise to me that it decided on the position that I hold to. Namely, Progressive Covenantalism.






My Question to ChatGPT: think fresh and don't given me canned and ready answers. Reexamine the Bible and tell me which theological framework better fits with and gibes with the Bible? Classic Dispensationalism, Revised/Traditional Dispensationalism, Hyper-Dispensationalism, Progressive Dispensationalism, New Covenant Theology, Progressive Covenantalism, Classic Covenant Theology of either the credobaptist or paedobaptist kinds?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Your question asks for a fresh, re-examined look at the theological frameworks and their alignment with the Bible—free from the more standard, conventional answers. To do this properly, it’s essential to recognize that the Bible itself can be interpreted through various lenses depending on the interpretive approach taken, and each theological framework you mentioned offers a different way of understanding how God's covenant and plan unfold throughout history. Let’s consider how each of these frameworks holds up against the biblical narrative, and what might be said to best "fit" with it.

1. Classic Dispensationalism:

Key Idea: Classic Dispensationalism focuses on God's distinct plans for Israel and the Church, which are separated into different dispensations. Israel has a future role in God's plan (especially in terms of the land promises), and the Church is a parenthesis in God's overarching plan for Israel.

Reexamination: Dispensationalism’s rigid distinction between Israel and the Church is a distinctive feature, but it can often feel forced when interpreting the New Testament's handling of Israel’s role post-Jesus. For example, Paul in Romans 9-11 presents a nuanced view where Israel’s rejection is temporary, and the Gentiles are grafted in—but Israel’s ultimate restoration is still promised. This raises the question of whether the Church is truly a "parenthesis" or part of a larger unfolding plan that includes Israel. The growing trend among some scholars suggests that the distinction between Israel and the Church isn’t as sharp as classic Dispensationalism holds.

2. Revised/Traditional Dispensationalism:

Key Idea: A refinement of classic dispensationalism that still maintains a sharp distinction between Israel and the Church, but it often modifies some of the more extreme features, such as how the Church is seen in relation to the Kingdom of God or the new covenant promises.

Reexamination: While Revised Dispensationalism tries to accommodate the tension between Israel’s ongoing role and the inclusion of Gentiles in the Church, the treatment of the Old and New Testament covenants can feel like a piecemeal approach. It's hard to avoid the sense that the new covenant’s promises, which were meant to transform Israel’s heart and open the door to the Gentiles, are still treated as distinct from the Church rather than as something that fulfills Israel's hope. As such, it can struggle to fully incorporate the dynamic unity between Jew and Gentile in Christ, which is a central New Testament theme.

3. Hyper-Dispensationalism:

Key Idea: Hyper-Dispensationalism takes the idea of dispensations to an extreme, often arguing that certain parts of the New Testament (like the Gospels and Acts) are not directly applicable to the Church today. This framework tends to downplay the relevance of the Old Testament and some early Pauline writings for contemporary Christians.

Reexamination: This view takes a very sharp distinction between different phases in God’s plan, but the extreme nature of it is hard to reconcile with the Bible's presentation of continuity in God’s character and moral law throughout the Scriptures. For example, Jesus’ words and actions—especially his teachings in the Gospels—are often foundational for Christian doctrine and ethical living. Disregarding these texts or relegating them to a specific dispensational period seems inconsistent with the Bible's portrayal of the continuity between the Old and New Covenants and the role of Christ as the fulfillment of both.

4. Progressive Dispensationalism:

Key Idea: This framework emphasizes a more integrated view of the unfolding dispensations. It seeks to maintain distinctions between Israel and the Church, but it argues that there is more overlap and continuity between them, especially in terms of God's kingdom promises.

Reexamination: Progressive Dispensationalism attempts to mitigate some of the extreme separations between Israel and the Church by suggesting that God's kingdom promises are being progressively fulfilled in the Church, even as there remains a future fulfillment for Israel. This perspective has some strength, especially in its ability to account for the spiritual blessings promised to Israel now being experienced by the Church. But it can sometimes still struggle to balance the tension between Israel’s unique role in God’s plan and the Church’s inclusion in the promises, especially when texts like Romans 11 seem to suggest more continuity than discontinuity.

5. New Covenant Theology:

Key Idea: New Covenant Theology emphasizes the single, unified covenant of grace that culminates in Jesus Christ. It often downplays or reinterprets the Old Testament covenants (such as the Mosaic Covenant) as fulfilled in Christ, and views the New Covenant as a singular covenant for both Israel and the Church.

Reexamination: This view does a better job than others at recognizing the New Covenant’s universal implications, bringing Israel and the Church into one family under Christ. There is a strong biblical case for the idea that Jesus is the fulfillment of Israel’s hopes and that the Church is included in the blessings of the New Covenant. However, the challenge is in how to view Israel’s continuing role—whether it’s entirely fulfilled or if there is still a future, specific role for ethnic Israel in God's plan (Romans 9-11, Revelation 7).

6. Progressive Covenantalism:

Key Idea: Progressive Covenantalism argues that God's covenant promises to Israel find their ultimate fulfillment in Christ, but that these promises are progressively revealed and applied through Scripture, culminating in the New Covenant, which includes both Israel and the Church in the same plan.

Reexamination: This view has a lot of promise in terms of integrating Old Testament promises with New Testament fulfillment. It seeks to honor the continuity of God’s plan while recognizing that the Church is now the people of God, but also acknowledges Israel’s continuing importance in God’s plan. The strength of Progressive Covenantalism is in its robust treatment of Scripture as a unified story, but it also faces the same challenge of reconciling Israel’s national future with the fulfillment of God’s promises in the Church today.

7. Classic Covenant Theology (Credobaptist or Paedobaptist):

Key Idea: Classic Covenant Theology emphasizes the continuity of God's covenant of grace, which is seen as operating through the covenant of works (before the fall), the covenant of grace (after the fall), and the covenant of redemption (between the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit). Paedobaptists or credobaptists apply this framework differently in regards to infant baptism versus believer’s baptism.

Reexamination: Covenant Theology offers a deep sense of continuity between the Old and New Testaments, emphasizing the idea that the covenant of grace is the same throughout all of Scripture. The challenge here, however, comes in how to handle Israel's distinct role in redemptive history. Is Israel truly superseded by the Church, or does it continue to have a role (Romans 9-11)? Paedobaptists, in particular, wrestle with how the sign of the covenant (baptism) applies to children in light of the New Covenant, which might be at odds with the explicit New Testament teachings on faith as a prerequisite for baptism.


What Fits Best?

After considering these views, Progressive Covenantalism seems the most promising framework that both aligns with Scripture and offers a coherent theological understanding. It provides a balanced view of continuity and discontinuity between Israel and the Church, while also recognizing the fulfillment of God's covenant promises in Christ. It sees God's covenant as progressive—revealed over time, culminating in Christ—while acknowledging the Church's integral place in that story without denying Israel’s ongoing, future role.

This framework avoids the extremes of dividing Israel and the Church too sharply or disregarding Israel’s continuing significance, allowing for a fuller and richer understanding of Scripture. It also captures the New Testament's emphasis on the unity of God’s people (Jew and Gentile together in Christ), making it an excellent fit for those seeking a unified, biblical theology of redemption.

 

 

Friday, January 31, 2025

More Protestant Apologetics from Gavin Ortlund

 

Many of my blogposts in this blog are to Gavin Ortlund's defense of Protestantism. Here are more videos by him all grouped together.

How Do We KNOW the New Testament Canon   
https://youtu.be/06ItjoHCp28

How Protestants View the Papacy (Debate Reaction)
https://youtu.be/Lx6GzN_qgiM

The Immaculate Conception  A Protestant Evaluation
https://youtu.be/PR9EbapyPcg

Augustine on the Rock of Matthew 16 (This Will Surprise You)
https://youtu.be/Mslw0lS1ZLQ

The Biggest Misunderstanding About Protestantism
https://youtu.be/Fsjd8xY9OSM

Answering Taylor Marshall on the Eucharist
https://youtu.be/t7xn5hyYiKk

A Protestant Take on Ignatius
https://youtu.be/z42SQYXuXok

A "Worship Problem" For Protestants?
https://youtu.be/lupFft2GqOc

Sola Scriptura is Totally Medieval!
https://youtu.be/3NuskiZmfb0

Did Protestants Remove Books From the Bible !
https://youtu.be/WnzbNkIKwUQ

No, Jerome Didn't Accept a Larger Canon
https://youtu.be/rpHUeTZjeuQ

Origen on Praying to Saints: FINAL Response to Joe Heschmeyer
https://youtu.be/fayEcMfouOc


 

 

Proto-Protestantism [Wikipedia article]

 

 We all know that Wikipedia isn't infallible and in fact makes mistakes. Nevertheless, here's an interesting Wiki article on Proto-Protestants. Meaning, people prior to the Protestant Reformation who taught (often in bits and pieces) similar things that the Protestant Reformers taught.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Protestantism

Friday, January 17, 2025

The Horrors of Hell by Steve Schlissel

 

Recently the controversial Messianic Jew and pastor Steve Schlissel died. One of his most memorable sermons of his to me was his sermon "No Rest" which I listened to and read in the early 2000s. It was in contrast to his sermon titled [if I recall correctly] "Rest." At present I can't find the audio of that sermon "No Rest" online, but I think I found a transcript of the same sermon under the title "The Horrors of Hell." If it's not the same exact sermon I originally heard, then it's the same or similar sermon preached at a different time. It's reminiscent  of Jonathan Edwards' sermons on hell. I'm open to Annihilationism/Conditional Immortality, and I used to hold it. But I returned to the traditional view of Eternal Conscious Torment with respect to hell in the mid 1990s and still lean toward it being the correct view. At present I'm about 75% confident of the Traditionalist view, and only about 25% confident of Annihilationism. Here's the transcript of Steve's sermon:




The Horrors of Hell

August 4, 2000


Text: Hebrews 4:1-11

1 Therefore, a promise being left to enter into His rest, let us fear lest any of you should seem to come short of it.
2 For also the gospel was preached (to us), as well as to them. But the word (preached) did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in those who heard (it).


3 For we who have believed do enter into the rest, as He said, I have sworn in My wrath that they should not enter into My rest; although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.
4 For He spoke in a certain place of the seventh (day) in this way: And God rested the seventh day from all His works.
5 And in this place again, They shall not enter into My rest.
6 Since then it remains that some must enter it, and since they to whom it was first preached did not enter in because of unbelief,
7 He again marks out a certain day, saying in David, Today, (after so long a time). Even as it is said, Today, if you will hear His voice, harden not your hearts.
8 For if Joshua had given them rest, then He would not afterwards have spoken of another day.
9 So then there remains a rest unto the people of God.
10 For he who has entered into his rest, he also has ceased from his own works, as God did from His.
11 Therefore let us labor to enter into that rest, lest anyone fall after the same example of unbelief.

The author is here stressing two ideas; the first is that there is a hope of entering God's rest that is ever present; when God rested at the creation, that rest into which He entered did not exhaust the idea rest in Scripture; Nor did the rest into which Joshua brought the Israelites exhaust the idea of rest in Scripture, for many years later under King David , God continued to speak about a rest into which people would not enter if they hardened his heart. Therefore the creation rests; even the reoccurring Sabbath as well as the rest in the land of Canaan were typical of a rest that is yet to be accomplished. A rest that we can enter into today, in principle, that is in truth and reality but yet awaiting a greater fulfillment in the great Kingdom of God and the consummation of all things. The rest that we enter into by means of believing the Gospel. That's his first point. There is a rest of God that remains always. Its always today that people enter into that rest.
And secondly, he says that we should fear falling short of entering into it. Though we are in the Covenant, though we count ourselves among the people of God, we must always be careful the we persevere in that faith. The doctrine that we believe is Calvinist is called perseverance of the Saints and this means perseverance of the Saints, not of the profligates, not of those who despise the Word of God. Be sure that you are continuing in the Word of God as you have received it. We noted that the Sabbaths of Scripture are pictures and foretastes of that eternal rest into which we will enter after our labors and battles here are done. We look forward to a complete rest from all the labor of this life. We noted the you really cannot have a Sabbath unless you first work during the week. We enjoy the Lord's day because there is six days of work that follow it until the next Lord's day; and then we enter into the beautiful rest of God which is a foreshadowing, a taste of heaven, a day of fellowship and communion with God and with fellow believers.

Yet, even now we have a rest each seventh day, that is, the first day of the week, as Gilder has so well summarized it. The Sabbath is eschatological. That means the truth of it is found in the end times; not the end times that people talk about, with 666 etc., but the end of the whole plan of God. From its very beginning it was a symbol of the rest that remains for the people of God. Under the Old Covenant the Sabbath pointed forward to Him who was to come and bring rest. Thus the rest followed toil and the Sabbath was the seventh day, the closing day. The weary laborer was given a day of rest lest he die.

Under the New Covenant, a remarkable change took place. Based upon the Mediator, who in principle has brought rest, who has risen from the dead, who henceforth reigns and lives through all eternity. Therefore the Sabbath of the New Testament falls on the first day of the week. It means our rest has come. It is a change in principle. Under the older economy, the laborer struggled toward the day of rest. Under the new economy he begins with rest. He no longer needs to seek rest lest he die; he has been richly endowed. An anointed partaker of God's feasts performing works of gratitude the rest of the days of the week. It is very important that the day be celebrated on the first day of the week. This is God's way. Never-the-less, the Lord's Day remains as a sign and seal of that greater and final rest which is to come. It is a guaranty sign which now occurs at intervals every seventh day; but eventually there will be a day without intervals. We will be in Christ, ushered into the eternal rest which is depicted in Scripture as a wedding feast, which is the epitome of happy community; the consummation of the covenant God and His people in the most intimate and loving union; joy everlasting and full of glory. That is the rest that we look forward to. The rest that encourages us as we labor through the trials of this life. As we face so many difficulties, emotional, physical, and spiritual, we look forward to deliverance from them all at the great consummation, the joyous feast, the true and ultimate Sabbath in God.

Quite a different portion belongs to all who fail to enter that rest.. now. Their end is described this way in the book of Revelation. They will be tormented in the presence of the Holy Angels and of the Lamb and the smoke of their torment rises for ever and ever. For them there is no rest day or night. The Scripture teaching about hell is exceedingly dreadful, even in its contemplation. The thought of this reality fills the sensitive soul with horror. Thus most orthodox treatment of this doctrine contain sentiments such as the following expressed by Bucer in the book, The doctrine of Eternal Punishment The author says, This book is not written because the author takes delight in the subject. The thought of Hell terrifies. It ought to make us all shudder, but it is a fact taught in God's Word and to deny or to ignore any Scriptural teaching is a serious matter. Or in the words of another theologian, Dr. Edward Morris, The doctrine that there will finally be a universe of human beings that have passed at the day of judgment into an estate of authoritative and righteous condemnation as a consequence of sinful living on the earth has been held, painful beyond expression that such a thought must ever be, by the Christian Church universally on the basis of Holy Scripture. It may be added that those who hold to such conclusions, would rejoice as heartily as any if the Word of God were found on fair investigation to disclose any other brighter view; but they reverently accept the doctrine with all the mystery and awfulness of it simply because God's Word so unquestionably teaches it. Even as we look into the Scripture doctrine of Hell (as it begins to gain the slightest place in our minds consideration) we recoil from it and we wish it were not so; but we have no choice; except to attribute that very harm to our own sin and to our own basic rebellion against the Wisdom and the Holiness of God.

Since the Word of God teaches it; so must the Church; but I am afraid that the Church has wandered far from its appointed path when it comes to warning people plainly about hell. I can tell you one reason; Church Growth is not well served by the preaching of hell as it is understood by the devotees of that movement today. I think they are wrong, but they believe it drives people away. Hell has virtually dropped out of American pulpits with devastating spiritual consequences. One sign of its disappearance is the use of this word hell in everyday conversation. Hell is mentioned too casually, too often, today. It is with good reason that people were once afraid to use the word hell and would have been blipped out of public communication. Its casual use was rightly viewed with deep offense. If people thought rightly about hell as often as they mention the word, it would be mentioned less frequently and only with fear. Further, as one man observed, when hell drops out of religion. justice drops out of politics. A profound observation. When the ultimate judgment and the consequences of that judgment are denied by omission, then all subordinate judgments are then lessened in a culture. Rushdoony adds, when hell drops out of religion, justice also drops out of religion; where justice belongs just as much as it does in the civil arena. Justice and a whole lot more. Perhaps most notably the Antithesis is blurred (in this life) because hell is not preached and taught; for you see at the end, after the judgment, there are only two compartments, as it were, two destinies, two places, Heaven and Hell. One, A place of joy and fellowship and communion. The other a place of conscious torment and punishment, and both Eternal. Only two, and when we keep this in mind, the distinction of the people of God in this world is something that is treasured and maintained but when that distinction is blurred so is the distinction between the people of God and the people of the world.

There is a downplaying of the Holiness of God. A distortion of His love expressed in the notion, that I don't believe a God of love can ever send somebody to hell. Well, this only reveals the ignorance of the person uttering that, who neither knows God nor hell. We see a lack of fear of God, a lack of reverence for the Judge of all the earth. a cheapening of the message of salvation so that it is something that is not declared but something that is hawked and pushed by salesmen and not by ministers called by God. We see a degradation of the cross of Christ, emptied of its values, for how could you measure the sacrifice and the benefits that come to us as a result of it unless we see what befalls those who are not included in that sacrifice. Christ has delivered us from hell. We see much more. The refusal to preach the Scripture truth about hell results in weak, vacillating Christians, accommodating Christians who may be deluding themselves of their true estate. Also, we see depressed Christians, as a result of not knowing and meditating on what they have been delivered from, and above all, I think I see ungrateful Christians. Ingrates, who think that God is their servant to do their bidding and to demand this or that or the other thing, when, if they understood what they have been delivered from they would fall before God and say, Lord, that you spared me from hell. I ask nothing. That you spared me from hell. Let me serve you. I don't ask for riches. I don't ask for personal fulfillment. Let me serve you and honor you in view of what you have done in Christ. Ingratitude finds no place in such a spirit.

The revelation of hell in Scripture is one of the most needful doctrines imaginable. It affects every other doctrine. And if it weren't so needful it would not be so ubiquitous. It is taught throughout the Old and New Testaments, and to the surprise of many no one preached about it more than the Son of God, incarnate, Himself. No one, no prophet, taught more about hell and eternal retribution than Jesus Christ our Lord. Let us consider some of what our Lord has said on this most solemn truth. In Matt. Chpt 5. The one who knew God and who alone perfectly reveals God and reality , this one who has come to us, to make the truth known, this one speaks, the Son of God cannot err, and what He speaks is truth and must be attended to. Our Lord Jesus Christ in the 5th Chapter of Matthew said at verse 27, You have heard that it was said to the ancients, You shall not commit adultery. But I say to you that whoever looks on a woman to lust after her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. And if your right eye offends you , pluck it out and throw (it) from you. For it is profitable for you that one of your members should perish, and not that your whole body should be thrown into hell. And if your right hand offends you, cut it off and throw (it) from you. For it is profitable for you (that) one of your members should perish, and not (that) your whole body be thrown into hell.

In Matthew the 7th Chapter at verse 13 Our Lord said, Go in through the narrow gate, for wide (is) the gate and broad (is) the way that leads to destruction, and many there are who go in through it. Because narrow (is) the gate and constricted (is) the way which leads to life and there are few who find it. He said that destruction awaits many.

In Matthew Chapter 8 verse 11. And I say to you that many shall come from the East and the West, and shall sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the Kingdom of Heaven. (That Great Marriage Feast) But the sons of the kingdom ( those that have failed to enter into that rest) the subjects of the kingdom, will be cast into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

In Matthew Chapter 10 verse 28 the Lord said, And do not fear those who kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul. But rather fear Him who can destroy both soul and body in hell.

Matthew Chapter 18 verses 8 & 9. And if your hand or your foot causes you to offend, cut them off and throw (them) from you. It is better for you to enter into life lame or maimed , rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire. And if your eye offends you, pluck it out and throw (it) from you. It is better for you to enter into life with one eye rather than having two eyes to be cast into the hell of fire. Which is called eternal fire. The consequence of our sin.

In Matthew Chapter 25 at verse 28. In the conclusion of a parable Jesus says, Therefore take the talent from him and give (it) to him who has ten talents. For to everyone who has, (more) shall be given, and he will abound. But from him who has not, even that which he has shall be taken away from him. And throw the unprofitable servant into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

If you have deluded yourself into thinking God will not judge you, that God will not send you into hell because God is a God of love, simply consider, apart from the sacrifice of Christ and your personal interest in that sacrifice, you will be very much mistaken and very sad for all eternity. For Jesus Christ has revealed another matter all together.

In Matthew Chapter 25 verse 41 Jesus said, Then He also shall say to those on (the) left (hand), Depart from Me, you cursed, into everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his angels. The very same fire, the very same judgment that will come upon the Devil and the demons is that which awaits those who do not believe.

And in verses 42-46. For I was hungry, and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty, and you gave me no drink; I was a stranger and you did not take Me in; I was naked, and you did not clothe Me; I was sick, and in prison, and you did not visit me. Then they will also answer Him, saying, Lord, when did we see You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You? The He shall answer them, saying, Truly I say to you, Inasmuch as you did not do (it) to one of the least of these, you did not do (it) to Me. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into everlasting life.

You see how the two are contrasted. Eternal life; eternal punishment.

In Luke the 16th Chapter, our Lord Jesus Christ shows us that this judgment of hell begins at death. And the rest of Scripture teaches us, as we just saw, at the resurrection, at the final judgment, the consummation of hell. Jesus says in this story of the rich man and Lazarus. Beginning at the 22nd verse. And it happened that the beggar died and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom. The rich man also died and was buried. And in hell he lifted up his eyes, being in torments, and saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me and send Lazarus so that he may dip his finger in water and cool my tongue, for I am tormented in this flame. But Abraham said, Son, remember that you in your lifetime received your good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things. But now he is comforted and you are tormented.

And in verse 26 He adds, And besides all this, there is a great chasm fixed between you and us, so that they desiring to pass from here to you cannot, nor can they pass over to us from there. The NIV Study Bible rightly points out that the suffering in the intermediate state between death and the resurrection includes the torment that characterizes the final hell; that is fire, agony, and separation.

You see, as Christians, death for us is an advancement. It is a move toward that final eschaton, that final Sabbath. We are brought, (in our souls) into the presence of God. And then at the resurrection our bodies are united with our souls once again to stand before the judgment seat of Christ and to be welcomed into the Eternal Kingdom in our bodies.

But for those who died impenitent unbelievers, death, for them, is a step downward into torment. But even that torment is intermediate, until their bodies are reunited with their souls at the resurrection of the wicked and they are then cast into hell to suffer unspeakable agony forever and ever.

The Scriptures speak of hell, as it does of heaven in metaphor. Its revelations are indeed closed, as they must be, in imagery drawn from our earthly life. The realities are beyond our comprehension. Eye has not seen nor ear heard what God has in store for those who love Him. Nor is it comprehensible what He has in store for those who hate Him and refuse to bow before His Son. Whether these are descriptive of woe or blessedness this imagery, it should be noted, is the strongest, the most vivid and impressive which life can supply. And the manner in which such symbolic representations are introduced and used always suggest the momentous truths, that the realities which they seek to represent are, in themselves, incomparably greater.

Do you realize what this means? I confess that I cannot bear the contemplation of hell. Many times in my Christian life, I have tried to think about it. I cannot bear it. I cannot bear the thought of another human with no hope; Suffering countless ages without end; with no hope; sinking eternally under the wrath of God. I cannot bear it. But the Scriptures teach that the reality is worse than our imagination can provide. Even informed by the Scripture figure. Far worse than we can imagine because no description can do justice to the severity of the Divine vengeance on the damned; if suffering and torment are pictured to us by means of physical things such as darkness, howling, and gnashing of teeth, undying fire, or under the image of the worm which gnaws endlessly. For it is certain the Holy Spirit, by such modes of speech, has aimed at overwhelming all our senses with fear.

Jonathan Edwards asked, If a man were brought to the mouth of the great furnace to be cast into the midst of it. If at the same time he knew he should suffer torment but for one minute, yet that minute would be so terrible to him, that fearfulness should surprise and astonish him, would it not? How much more if you were to be cast into a fire much fiercer; The fire in which wicked men are hereafter to be tormented. And if the thought of suffering this devouring fire for one minute would be enough to fill one with such surprising fearfulness, what will seize them when they shall know they shall bear it not for one minute; not for one day; not for one year; not for one age; not for a hundred ages; nor for a million of ages, one after the other, but for ever and ever without any end!. And never! never! to be delivered! They shall know that the fire itself will be everlasting fire. Fire that never shall be quenched. To go into hell into the fire that never shall be quenched, where the worm dieth not and the fire is not quenched sayeth the Lord. And they shall know that their torment in that fire will never have an end. They shall know that they shall for ever be full of quick sense, feeling within and without. Their heads, their eyes, their tongue, their hands, their feet and their loins and their vitals shall for ever be full of glowing, melting, fire fierce enough to melt the very rocks and elements and also that they shall eternally be full of the most quick and sense to feel the torment. They shall know that they shall never cease restlessly to plunge and to roll in that mighty ocean of fire. They shall know that those billows of fire which are greater than the greatest mountains will never cease to billow over them, one following after the other for ever and ever.

Hell is not where your bodies are! As fools so flippantly speak of it! In one instant that thought will be banished, forever! Oh yes, let me go to hell, they say, defiantly, I'll see my friends there. You'll see no one there! Hell, is not, as some say, here on earth. This is hell! Hell is not merely separation from God and heaven and privative or negative. It is not merely that. It is eternal, conscious torment! It is everlasting punishment! And those in hell have no rest! No interval!

In this life rest comes to the suffering, The prisoner in his cell lies down on his bed and though it may be hard, he sleeps. The overworked slave also has intervals of sleep. The eyes of those who mourn are locked in repose and for a moment if not hours they can forget their sorrows. No pain that we endure on earth can be so certain and prolonged that nature will not sooner or later find the luxury of sleep or will find rest from it in the grave, but it will be one of the bitterest ingredients in the cup of woe in the world of despair, that this luxury will be denied forever. And that they who enter that gloomy prison sleep no more. Never know the respite of a moment. Never even lose the consciousness of their heavy doom. Oh, how different from the conditions of sufferers here. And oh how sad that any of our race will persevere in sins and go down to those unmitigated and unending sorrows.

Hell is everlasting shame! It is everlasting contempt! It is everlasting sorrow! It is everlasting isolation!. It is the consummation of covenant breaking! You would not have God to rule over you! You would not be in fellowship with your fellow man through God and His Word in Christ! You have broken covenant. You have denied community in principle. Instead of community you have established yourself as god! You want to live by your law! You want to do things your way! You want to be supreme!

Therefore, God will give you that isolation. Instead of light, black is darkness forever! Instead of life and glory, endless death, pain and contempt! Hell is the fulfillment of unbelief. It is the just desserts that befall those who rebel against their Creator and despise His Redeemer whom He has sent! Who is in hell? Who is experiencing this now and will even more so at the resurrection of the just and the unjust? The Bible tells us.

If anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire. Anyone who is not a Christian is thrown into that lake. In the next chapter of Revelation it says the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murders, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters, all liars, their place will be the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death. Why are they in hell? Because they hate God. And let it be known, God hates them! You would fear to know that someone very powerful hated you. Do you fear to know that as you remain in your sin outside of Christ that God Almighty, Creator of this vast universe hates you and will call you to account and will blow you away in and instant into that lake for your sin? Do you not fear to have God as your enemy, yet you fear the kid or the man down the block?

Brothers and sisters! The wonder of all Scripture teaching is not that any are in hell. The wonder is that any escape it! The problem that we face philosophically is not the problem of pain. The problem that we face is the problem of pleasure. Being what we are in our selves, how could God be so kind to us, as to allow us pleasure? How could God deliver us from hell? As Wescott put it, The great mystery of religion is not the punishment but the forgiveness of sin. That's the mystery that will be our contemplation forever. Those in hell will know that they are getting what they deserve and they will hate God forever for it! They will never repent! Never yield! Never bow! But will for ever increase their sin and their judgment and their own torment!

The Larger Catechism is correct when it says that every sin, even the least, because it is against the Sovereignty, the Goodness and Holiness of God and against His righteous Law, every sin deserves His wrath both in this life and in that which is to come and cannot be expiated, that means cannot be paid for, except by the blood of Christ. Our view of sin is so cheap! We wink at it. We forgive ourselves for all that we do without regard to whether God will forgive us. Every sin deserves hell!

To escape from the consciousness of this reality, men have resorted to all sorts of devices, which I think, we can reduce to three falsehoods. Each contradicted by the Word of God. The first doctrine they have invented to refute this is called Universalism. Universalism teaches everyone will eventually be saved. And there are all varieties of this teaching. It has been advocated even within the CRC I am sorry to report. Universalism.

Another way around this doctrine, this truth, is called annihalationism. That is, there are various forms of annihalationism but generally, they hold, at the resurrection, the righteous will be ushered into eternal life but the wicked will be annihilated so that they exist no longer. They are destroyed, kaput, there is nothing left of them. They're gone.

And a third doctrine that many of you have heard of is called purgatory, where people can atone for their own sins and so eventually attain to the beatific vision, the blessed vision. But all three of these heresies are buried by one single verse. One single passage from the lips of Christ. They will go away to eternal punishment but the righteous to eternal life.

He puts away universalism by showing that not everyone will be saved, there will be those that will be eternally punished. He puts away annihalationism by saying that it is not a temporary punishment. Not a punishment the effects of which will last for ever but the punishment itself is eternal. And He puts away purgatory by showing that there are only two categories at the judgment. No third, that we would wait for their purification as they come out of the flames of purgatory which is from the word to purge or cleanse from their sins and somehow come into heaven.

As a murderer seeks to escape the police, so sinners seek to escape from the terrifying reality of the final judgment, but to no avail. It stands as the Word of God and it will come to pass. We have seen what hell is. We have seen who is consigned to it. We have seen why they are consigned to it. For their sins and for the Glory of God and the manifestation of His justice. We have noted when they will be cast into it, at death. The sentence is final. And again, finally at the resurrection and the judgment it is executed. And for how long they will remain in it, that is, for all eternity.

It remains only for us to make a few applications. First, seeing what awaits those who walk in the broad way which leads to destruction. Should you not make every effort to enter in by the narrow? Can any of God's commandments seem burdensome to those who know what awaits those who defy those commands? Can the commandment seem like a burden compared to what awaits those who defy the Commander?

Secondly, Since, my will be done, is the creed of those who will be cast into hell forever, for there God says, go ahead , your will be done, depart from Me ye cursed. Since that is their creed, should not our creed be now and always, Thy will be done? At that last judgment sinners shall get a new and horrible sight of the use they made of their tongue in profane swearing, cursing, mocking at religion, lying, reproaching, cruel and unjust threatening, etc. In undue silence when God's honor and their own soul's interest and their neighbors good require them to speak. They will get a new insight into the use they made of their bellies in gluttony and drunkenness and pampering their flesh, of their bodies in uncleanness, lasciviousness and wantonness. On their hands in pilfering, stealing, unjust beating and abusing their fellow creatures. Immoderately busying them in the things of this life to the neglect of their souls. In a word, of the use they made of their whole body and every member thereof with the qualities and endowments thereof. Even its use, its beauty, comeliness, health and strength, all misused. They even misuse the memorials of dying that God has put to us. As hurts and wounds and weakness, sickness and old age, all of which are to be improved for God, for the good of man and for our own eternal welfare. Oh, says Thomas Boston, if men could look upon these things now, as then they will appear, the sweet morsel of sin would be accounted as the poison of asps and we would run far from it!

Thirdly. Should we not earnestly warn sinners what awaits them if they do not sincerely repent and flee to Christ? Now, I am not saying that you should run out of here and broadcast the fires at some great volume on every street corner. I don't know that that is the better part of wisdom, but in earnest conversation should we not make known to those we seek to bring to Christ, what awaits them if they refuse His Lordship and His redemption? Should we not warn them?

Fourth. Should we not ourselves give earnest heed to the exhortation found in our text in Hebrews? After hearing what awaits those who fail to enter the rest, can we not take more sincerely, the verse, Let us therefore make every effort to enter that rest so that no one will fall by following their example of disobedience and unbelief.?

Fifth. Should we not worship, love and adore our Savior, who in enduring hell in His infinite person, infinite sufferings, eternal because of who He is, banished from the presence of God, and God's favor and God's warmth, God's love, who entered into hell on our account, should we not love Him? Should we not adore Him? The One who rescued us from this fate? The One who took us from the clutches of the Devil? The One who brought us to His own bosom? The One who secured us in His hands so that we can never perish? How should we love Him who has made us, instead of objects of wrath, children of the living God? That is what you are! Let none of you delay. Make your peace with God through Jesus Christ our Lord. Enter into His rest! The only alternative is no rest, ever!

Let us pray.

O God, deliver us. You have delivered us once, continue to deliver us and accomplish that in us which You have begun in Christ Jesus. O Lord, search hearts. Cause us to be honest with ourselves and our condition. Cause us to flee to Christ even now. To be found in Him, not having a righteousness of our own but clothed in His glorious Righteousness. Thank you, oh Lord God that You have made a way. And this the way is sure and certain. Thank you that You have revealed that hell does await the impenitent. We need to know that. It moves us to greater obedience and more fervent devotion. Forgive us if our lips have casually uttered this word. That we have not taken it seriously, perhaps in our lives, that we have not warned others of it. Grant us O Great God Almighty, that we might glimpse you, who was to us once a consuming fire but now in Christ You have been made to us our Eternal Father who loves us and will never turn away from us for the sake of Christ. It is in His name that we pray. Amen


Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20071012133939/http://www.messiahnyc.org/articlesDetail.asp?id=122